Microsoft Dynamics NAV and Jira integration
Procurement teams need visibility into both supplier commitments and team workload. Microsoft Dynamics NAV tracks vendors, purchase orders, and invoices; Jira tracks work items and delivery. Connecting them surfaces purchase obligations in the same project management tools where your team plans and executes delivery. New vendors can be registered as accounts in Jira, purchase orders appear as linked epics with line items as subtasks, and the audit trail ties back to the source.
What moves between them
Records flow one way, from Dynamics NAV into Jira. Vendors are created as Jira accounts or custom records, purchase orders become Jira issues or epics, and purchase order line items appear as subtasks or linked issues. The sync runs on a schedule you control, polling Dynamics NAV for new and changed POs and vendors because purchase orders are not available via Dynamics NAV webhooks. Once created in Jira, the records remain there as a living project record; Dynamics NAV remains the source of truth for procurement data. Comments and status updates in Jira are not written back to Dynamics NAV.
How ml-connector handles it
ml-connector stores Dynamics NAV OAuth credentials and Jira API token encrypted, and refreshes both tokens when API calls return 401. On the Dynamics NAV side, it polls for vendors and purchase orders on a schedule you set, then maps each vendor to a Jira account or custom issue type and each PO to an issue or epic with line items as subtasks. Because Dynamics NAV webhooks expire every 3 days and do not cover purchase orders, polling is the primary sync mechanism; a webhook listener can supplement for vendors and other master data if enabled. On the Jira side, ml-connector handles the custom field IDs which vary per Jira instance and creates linked issues so procurement data is visible in the same tool as delivery planning. Pull-back is not supported because Jira has no native invoice or accounting fields. Every record carries a full audit trail and can be replayed if a downstream Jira call fails.
A real-world example
A small manufacturing company runs Dynamics NAV for procurement and finance, and Jira for engineering and production work. Before integration, the procurement team tracked POs in Dynamics NAV, but the engineering team had no visibility into supplier commitments or incoming materials. Purchase order information was manually entered into Jira spreadsheets or notional epics. With Dynamics NAV connected to Jira, each new purchase order appears automatically as a Jira issue, line items are subtasks, and the vendor is linked. The engineering team sees material arrival commitments in their planning tools without manual rekey, and procurement can link POs to engineering tasks for suppliers who impact critical path.
What you can do
- Sync vendors from Microsoft Dynamics NAV to Jira as accounts or custom records for supplier visibility in your project management tools.
- Create purchase orders as Jira issues or epics, with line items appearing as subtasks, tied to the original vendor.
- Map Dynamics NAV items to Jira issue types and custom fields so procurement data fits your project structure.
- Poll Dynamics NAV on a schedule you control, with automatic retries and a full audit trail on every vendor and purchase order.
- Refresh both OAuth 2.0 tokens automatically and handle Dynamics NAV's 3-day webhook subscription renewal.
Questions
- Why does data flow only one way, from Dynamics NAV to Jira?
- Jira is a project and issue tracking system with no native vendor, purchase order, or accounting entities. It has no fields to store back financial data such as invoice amounts, GL accounts, or payment terms. Dynamics NAV remains the source of truth for all procurement data; Jira is a read-only window for visibility and workflow.
- Why does ml-connector poll instead of relying on Dynamics NAV webhooks?
- Dynamics NAV webhooks expire every 3 days and must be manually renewed, and purchase orders are not included in the standard webhook entity list. Polling on a schedule you control is more reliable for procurement data that must be available continuously. A webhook listener can still be registered for vendors and other master data if needed.
- How are Jira custom field IDs handled if they vary between instances?
- Every Jira instance has its own custom field IDs for issue type, priority, and vendor reference. ml-connector stores these mappings per Jira workspace so purchase orders are created with the correct fields for your Jira configuration. Custom field mappings are set up during connector onboarding.
Related integrations
More Microsoft Dynamics NAV integrations
Other systems that connect to Jira
Connect Microsoft Dynamics NAV and Jira
Free to use. Add your credentials, ping your real systems, and see if we fit.
Get started